thetree, stop. youre wrong, and heres why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvA6aI5eiAI
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/20/s...type-hands-on/
all of your stupid assumptions and prejudices, alleviated. stop proclaiming capacitive is better, thats a ****ing myth perpetrated by apple. it wasnt the tech behind the screen it was the software running it. i dont need a toy, when the res is as high as what is on the n900. i want to click teeny tiny links in a full web browser. notice that the interface for cap tech devices have icons the size of stewies head ... id prefer precision and accuracy.
Have you tried this at -15oC, with wind? Do try, and keep 'em off for 10 minutes or so.
So, have you got a chance to compare [apparently crappy] N900 touchscreen with the [apparently advanced] iPod touchscreen? Because I have, and aside from being able to use nails on the N900 they are not that much different in operation.
Add in that most (not all) resistive touch screens have poor sensitivity, low accuracy, and are single touch,
phones are no longer made for end users. they're designed for people who have no education