View Single Post
juise-'s Avatar
Posts: 186 | Thanked: 192 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Finland
#283
Originally Posted by jutl View Post
Interestingly the N900 is mentioned specifically as infringing on three of the counterclaimed patents...
I am not a patent lawyer, and didn't read the full descriptions on these patents, but:

The '647 patent
This shouldn't hold, as there is nothing non-obvious in the implementation (regular expression and hyperlink), after the initial idea (which shouldn't be patentable).

This one highlights nicely why software patents should not be granted.

The '981 patent
Sounds like they can sue just about everyone with this, if it holds. (of course it could be that everyone else has already licensed it)

The '905 patent
Ditto, as it's a feature of the chipset, and not something that Nokia implemented specifically for themselves.
__________________
Trout have underwater weapons.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to juise- For This Useful Post: