View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#1240
Originally Posted by somedude View Post
if i own Adobe why would i use up my resources for a small market? while at the same time with same resources i can target a larger market segment resulting more profit.
To save face as you used that market, no matter how small, to demonstrate the state of your technology, because your real targets were ridiculously unpresentable at the time (skip the N900 part of the infamous Kevin Lynch demo and look at what state the Android version was).

thats the exact thinking of adobe may-be? or there really is something that adobe needs from Nokia to port the 10.1 because Nokia has that part locked down. (similar reason why no flasf for iPhone because of hardware and software lockdown?)
They always say Flash is hardware independent and it falls back to software-based renderers/codecs. I just want a public ARM Linux build from them. I don't want them to care, know, or pretend they even heard about the N900. Just. publish. an. ARMv7. build. Seriously. I don't care about speed, I care about inaccessible content. Why don't they release an ARM build ? They released a specialized Android build so a generic one should be super-easy to do. Adobe's distribution model just plain sucks (regardless if Nokia is guilty or not of not pushing for an N900 release).
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: