View Single Post
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#33
Originally Posted by slender View Post
And that is why I think that we should have much much stricter policy for banning people. This place isnīt wall of cry for people who feel that they have been betrayed by Nokia.
If someone isn't behaving and for example in every topic posting about their issue (like christexport was complaining about lack of portrait mode in tons of topics) you can perform various solutions:

1) You can ask a the person to moderate their behavior
2) You can put the person to your ignore list
3) You can ignore the person by not reading his/her contributions

Banning someone has a big impact because it can be easily abused to silence criticism. It should be used carefully, and it isn't even effective.

Why this community should care about feedback that is basically just great example of how hormones fck up your brains while you are teenager.
Many people who are concerned are not teenager. I don't see why you are including this in a post where you ask for moderation on behavior, btw.

Itīs just endless loop of opinions based on pure subjective feelings and guess who cares about it? No ONE.
Forums are meant to be biased. If you want only facts, go to a wiki, and do not read the Talk: pages.

BTW, perhaps its time to call the beast by its name and provide some examples.

Hmm. Complainers agenda is to make Nokia react and this is wrong forum for it.
No, that is a long-term goal. Short-term goal is to raise awareness.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: