View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#45
Originally Posted by kureyon View Post
So are you saying that the blame lies with the manufacturer even though it is the carrier which is demanding the crippling as condition for carrying the device?
Why are you saying the blame lies with the carrier even though it is the manufacturer which is in control of any crippling (or lack thereof) as a condition for offering their device to the carrier?

Chances are far more likely that the devices aren't being crippled so much as being bloated, is kinda the point.