Although I generally agree with the spirit of the article, you're right to point that out. I also want to point out that he says Symbian should be replaced with a much better new OS from Nokia--but the article was written as if there wasn't already a Maemo or MeeGo. Seems to me that this writer might not have followed Nokia very well (which, in and of itself, is sort of hard to do from outside of Europe--part of the whole "perception problem" with Nokia).