View Single Post
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#62
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
That's just the very thing about the article--whether you agree or not, the main point is still that Nokia has a perception problem. I've never used Symbian, myself, but the impression I get from various exposure to people who have is a generally negative one that makes it sound/feel retro and outdated. I can't say that I think that--it's just the impression I'm getting from the general consensus, right or wrong. Nokia would do well to fix that perception.
Symbian doesn't have bling-bling, and is a capability-based OS with microkernel (which neither Android, iOS, or Maemo are). Imagine the complexity of such OS, and it does mean impact on resources (ie. microkernel generally 10% performance). It wasn't made with multimedia or touchscreen in mind, and it doesn't follow some new UI paradigms. It is actually well made for enterprise: sober, and build with security in mind.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: