View Single Post
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#116
Originally Posted by Sopwith View Post
Excuse me for jumping into your argument, but aren't you discussing two different albeit related things: whether Flash is good for users, and whether it is good for developers. The reason you're locked out of half the Internet and feel forced to use the proprietary Flash is because developers have chosen to use it. So when you want to drive Flash out, you want to dictate to the developers what tools they should use. Well, I say, you can do that only by choosing websites developed with the tools you prefer. But you should also be able to accept that other end users may choose differently, and thus Flash may survive longer than you want.
I'm both a user and a developer, and it's bad for both of me. It's not the tools, it's the product. Use whatever tools you want, just produce "code" that's compliant with some sort of open initiative governing spec. Otherwise, burn in Hell.

It would have been so much more convenient if we all thought exactly the same, wouldn't it?
You're so right, let's have everything different and proprietary. Sign me up!
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: