View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#103
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Quim probably has more important things to do, and given the "or" condition of the rule I will go ahead and report that the 3 deciding council members were in unanimous agreement that Robin's (w00t's) candidacy should stand.
Thanks, I've copied & pasted it to the thread on maemo-community which caused this.

There was confusion all around on this and obviously a need for the next council to address the holes.
Was there really confusion? Apart from the initial confusion of Robin caused by Dave's email (something Dave's apologised for), the process seems spot on. There was a bit of confusion about "nomination" being the wrong noun, but - on reflection - I remember why it was worded like that, and it covers the situation we were in: if a person's nomination is invalid, they can't be a candidate (because their nomination never existed).

Of course, if people can suggest improved language, I'm sure the next Council can consider whether or not it's worth the time and energy to pursue a referendum for a circumstance that has occurred once in five elections.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org