View Single Post
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#487
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
As you said, the conversion of all these devices to being an appliance. The first thing that comes to mind in that case are things like DVRs, TVs, and game consoles. The computer is no longer capable of doing whatever the user wants, but only what the vendor allows them to do.

What you describe is essentially what Apple is trying to do, indeed given a hardware revision they could attempt to replace the standard desktop entirely for many people, and in place give them something relatively locked down. We're not there yet but Apple and Microsoft are driving hard in that direction, and I'm hard pressed to believe Google isn't as well.

I suppose this diverges from the original course of discussion (and is almost certainly off topic) but I think we need to be wary about having capability shifted out of our hands and into those of others
Ah! I see. Thanks for the clarification!

As these technologies are open and standardized (like HTML/Javascript), I see vendor lock-in as being effectively muzzled, or to a much larger degree than they are currently -- vendors cannot force you to use their OS/hardware at threat of no-access to their apps. I see these technologies as empowering the consumer and the developer and decentralizing control over an entire software ecosystem (and ensuring that it remains relevant after device exhaustion!).

This is similar to web Flash games. Sure miniclip.com can host many games, and entice users to visit in order to play, but they cannot (by virtue of the technology) lock users into playing games exclusively through their URL. Even a kid in his basement can host the same game!

Only time will tell in the end! Even the most convincing of arguments must stand trial against the scrutiny of time.

I know this is indeed off-topic, but must say that I have really enjoyed this conversation!