View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#49
Which part of the fact that I've been using 800x480 in the past seems to escape you?

Which part of that fact seems to escape you that I do not like it? Which part of the fact seems to escape you that I've stated over and over that I'm - which, for the English language less savvy denotes that I am unwilling to personally accept anything less?

The fact you're so eager to argue is my own opinion about how I don't have to accept less. Feel free to do so for yourself. I don't have to; nor will I.

And to answer your last question... what can I do at 800x480 that I cannot do at 640x360... see about 160x120 more pixels to start with...

Captain Obvious... out.