View Single Post
Posts: 523 | Thanked: 292 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#99
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Quite easily, honestly. They're selling Android phones with 2.1, right? It doesn't support Flash 10.1 either. The selling of the phones with Flash 9.x is commonplace. It's the update that's actually quote "odd" - not many phones received Flash updates in the past.

To be honest, MicroB delivers the "best internet experience"... it reacts just like I would expect a desktop to react to websites, et al.



Or... we'll get Flash 10.1 on the N900 if some enterprising soul backports it. All of this talk about what Adobe "charges" is unverified.
I am just about to pick up an HTC Wildifire for the wife and I undertand that will be upgradable soon to 2.2, this is a £200 phone, unlike the N900 which was sold for over twice as much. Surely a top of the range phone should be able to view most website for at least 12 months?

Assuming there is no Flash update this will probaly be my last Nokia.