View Single Post
benlau's Avatar
Posts: 135 | Thanked: 375 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Hong Kong
#43
Originally Posted by RobbieThe1st View Post
It's called a PPA. You can usually find them for whatever package you want, and all it is is a small repo for whatever package or set of packages you want.
Want the absolute latest Firefox package? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozill...y/+archive/ppa <- Just use that. You'll have up-to-the-day updates, but the trade-off is that your using untested, nightly software.
If you are using a "stable" repo, like setup by default, then things are pre-tested for you, and generally won't screw up your system or have major bugs. On the other hand, running from devel, testing or nightly repositories can cause problems.

What a lot of people don't seem to get - You included - Is that there is generally a good *reason* for doing something one way. It may not seem the best to you, but you aren't developing an OS either. The people who generally decide these things have way more experience with such things than you or I - Trying to second-guess such knowledge isn't a good idea.
I have my own PPA account , I offer package for my OSS software , and backport package , for example , Qt for Hardy. Although I am not a Debian developer , I have made Debian package for many years. I use Debian SID for my desktop , it is changed to Ubuntu few month ago. And my day time job is about embedded Linux product, that may include u-boot , kernel porting.

yes , I am not developing OS , but I don't think I am a layman user of Linux. I just want to express my opinion toward the package system.

Moreover , I am not saying that package system is not good , but it is not prefect. An addition way of software installation is not a bad idea too.

I have a Mac book pro , it is used for my day time job. Their DMG is really a simple software installation method . However, Mac OS still have its own package system , mpkg . System software and library installation usually use this format. It just like deb / rpm , but the feature is much poor.

DMG is for application software installation ,and mpkg is for system tool . User normally won't need to deal with any dependency issue , installation just means to drop the file to Application folder. Why can't we consider this additional installation method? And restrict ourself to a single way? Just becoz we are not developing OS?
__________________
Qt Ambassador | Nokia Certified Qt Specialist
PenPen SketchBook |
FrontView - 0.2 is released! | DQuest
Status: Now working on GTD software

Last edited by benlau; 2010-10-12 at 10:34.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to benlau For This Useful Post: