View Single Post
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#61
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
What he did was identify just a handful of key sellable features that he can commit his limited resources on (design, code, produce, etc) and omit/delay/underrate the rest of the features... until they are ready to deliver those (missing features).

If he didn't go through that pattern, Apple couldn't have taken a market\mindshare lead just as they did with the iPhone.
I was going add a suggestion to your post but I saw you had underrate in there. Spot on! Frankly that's the main thing that annoys me about Apple (or rather Jobs) and I think that's what causes the mind control problem that some Apple owners have (the ones that claim that X feature isn't necessary only to change their minds when Jobs changes his mind).
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: