Thread: Android in 3D
View Single Post
wmarone is offline wmarone
2010-11-04 , 21:14
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#18
Originally Posted by Capt'n Corrupt View Post
Of course, the cost to benefit ratio. Now let me ask you this question: as the tech continues to improve (physical display, autostereo, GPU/CPU), and your gear gets old and needs to be replaced, would you choose 3D?
Sure, but only if it shows its value and doesn't require that I fit it. Unfortunately that seems to be a ways off, especially for glasses-free, multi-viewer systems.

I guess what I'm trying to ask is, all things being equal, would you choose 3D over 2D? I'm betting yes, but could be wrong.
All things being equal? Sure, but we're a long ways from that I suspect

I'm an early adopter, but not of just anything.

When moving to colors you had to use about 3 times more bandwidth, no?
Sure, but it was transparent. Color was appended to NTSC such that new TVs could use it, old ones were still black and white, and you didn't have to wear silly glasses to view it and it worked at any normal angle. It's... not quite the same.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: