Creamy Goodness: Yes, injection was verified by a bunch of beta testers. So at least that was verified. As did a bunch of stuff working.

But on the other hand, I agree with most of your other points. And I suspect you meant more or less guarantee of future development and support.

hawaii: I think it's rather... unrealistic? To call any security auditing / penetration testing tool something distinct from hacking tools. Since you're basically security-auditing / penetration-testing by performing hacking attempts. The intent differs, but I think the tool is ultimately validly labeled as either or. It's like how a martial art is a martial art - now you can spar for practice, and that's not fighting, but a spar is basically a controlled fight, in that you don't go beyond a certain point. A security audit is basically a hacking attack - you just stop when you've established you can get access, or resume to see if you can get access through another security hole, etc.

Not saying NeoPwn is MEANT to be a tool for hackers. Of course not. But to suggest that half the users out there won't be at some point trying to use it for the same purpose is rather denialistic.