Thread: Boost N900! :)
View Single Post
SavageD is offline SavageD
2010-11-16 , 13:30
Posts: 436 | Thanked: 406 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#109
Originally Posted by James_Littler View Post
A little un-called for don't you think?! I am only sharing my experience with you in the hope of furthering your development.


Looking at the graphs, I can see a very similar decline in both standby and when the CPU is actually under use. The actual battery % is very inaccurate so the only way to accurately monitor battery drain is by looking at the gradient of mAh decline, in which case our graphs are very similar.

If I drop from 90% to 60%, is that not the same as dropping from 50% to 20%.
I see your a wise guy...repeating the same lines specifically to annoy me.

Originally Posted by James_Littler View Post
As mentioned , I have a fresh flash, both Fiasco and eMMC so it is as if your patches never existed.
And then saying my reaction was uncalled for?? Every action has a reaction, remember that T_T.

This test wasn't about standby time, as we confirmed that we had the same standby time already...this test was to confirm whether or not my patches made saving battery life more efficient under heavy use, as mentioned a couple pages back.

It is clear that my patch was more efficient in saving battery life under heavy use, as you demonstrated by comparing the two images.

Your decline was alot steeper at the end of the test, which indicates that you lost a lot more mah and percentage at the end.

Btw how much % did you loose, or is it a secret? Cause you're not mentioning it.