Thread: Boost N900! :)
View Single Post
James_Littler's Avatar
James_Littler is offline James_Littler
2010-11-16 , 13:39
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#110
Originally Posted by SavageD View Post
I see your a wise guy...repeating the same lines specifically to annoy me.
No, I just didn't think you understood that my OS is fresh and has never had your patches applied.

Originally Posted by SavageD View Post
And then saying my reaction was uncalled for?? Every action has a reaction, remember that T_T.
No, every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

Originally Posted by SavageD View Post
his test was to confirm whether or not my patches made saving battery life more efficient under heavy use
...
It is clear that my patch was more efficient in saving battery life under heavy use, as you demonstrated by comparing the two images.

Your decline was alot steeper at the end of the test
That was me playing kroll.

Originally Posted by SavageD View Post
Btw how much % did you loose, or is it a secret? Cause you're not mentioning it.
Not sure, as I mentioned before, battery % is not accurate and is completely irrelevant. What we are comparing is mAh/hour, we could only compare battery % if:

1. We both use the exact same battery charged for the same amount of time.
2. We do the exact same activities for the exact same length of time.

We can then compare % loss. Seeing as that is never going to happen (as a truly fair test) the best we can go on is mAh loss/gradient decline.

If you want to get really clever you could break down the gradient into an equation, that would be the best comparison.