Thread: [Council] State of Maemo, Q32010.2
View Single Post
stenny is offline stenny
2010-12-02 , 13:24
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#26
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
...if someone doesn't respond in a timely manner, bugging them/the Council/Quim seems more appropriate than saying "well, I filed it, nothing happened, therefore Nokia is purposefully saying one thing and not doing another". Don't ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence, forgetfulness or over-work.
This is ridiculous. If they can't respond in a timely manner to their bug tracker they need to get the hell out of the software industry altogether. It doesn't matter if it's malice, idiocy, or (poor babies) over-work. If Nokia stipulates a procedure and the procedure doesn't work because of them then Nokia is full of crap, full stop.

At the very least the Council can stop bleating about "opening up maemo" every six months so we don't have to explain to a new batch of users that it is all talk and no action.

Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
I don't disagree. And, for Fremantle, the bits I'm interested in seeing improved are already open source.
Well, congratulations, you fantastic egotist. Is it dizzying, the way the world revolves around you? I guess we can stop talking about this altogether, since you've got what you want.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stenny For This Useful Post: