View Single Post
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#1441
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
C'mon, you're not even close here. Samsung was first-to-market in a space that's gonna be flooded next year. Match Apple in design? No way. Apple design goes far beyond a rectangle of glass. I own an 11" MacBook Air and a unibody Mac Mini. Those are the cutting edge of industrial design. And the last sentence: what features? It's a simple tablet running Android with a gimmicky, proprietary connector.

Dude, come back to Earth.
Design quality is an entirely subjective metric. I will not argue which is 'better', but I will say this: there is more to hardware design than the enclosure, and Samsung has proved sound design in terms of high quality components and build-quality in their devices. The Galaxy Tab is no exception: it's a very well built device down to the choice of parts and its construction.

I will also add this: people's concept of quality seems biased incredibly towards what they immediately perceive. I'm not knocking Apple on quality by any means, I'm merely asserting that this is an area that they capitalize upon. If quality were measured by another metric, for example, Asus could conceivably rate #1 as according to one study they've been unmatched in terms of reliability for their laptops.

One last thing: for a person who hates this thread, you certainly read it a lot.....

Last edited by Capt'n Corrupt; 2010-12-03 at 15:14.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: