Thread
:
What woud you realistically like to see in the N900?
View Single Post
Capt'n Corrupt
2007-10-31 , 14:15
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#
93
@aflegg
Good point!
Being exclusively a developer on x86, I often forget that x86 code that heavily uses assembly for optimization isn't a straight port for non-x86 CPUs. You're 100% correct. Well structured C programs and other high-language programs would be much more easy to simply compile for the arm environment. High performance libraries (like libavcodec that I mentioned above) would likely rely on many low-level optimizations, that would take modification in key areas to run efficiently on the Nxxx series.
Assembly dialect translation should be a trivial matter for support's sake. I believe that the GNU assembler can already parse Intel/AT&T syntax and compile for different target architectures [
GAS info here
]. Granted, code performance wouldn't be the same, but at least the programs would be compilable and later can be tuned for performance.
By 'video bandwidth' are you referring to the cpu/memory/bus bottleneck limiting video output?
}:^)~
YARR!!
Quote & Reply
|
Capt'n Corrupt
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Capt'n Corrupt
Find all posts by Capt'n Corrupt