View Single Post
Posts: 3 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#52
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Well, let's hold them to their word:
  1. Find a package
  2. Find someone who could realistically maintain it
  3. Put together a business case.

The Council would be happy to help with any of the above. We will also then push Nokia for an official response - of course, it might be "no", but that should be accompanied by an explanation.

However, I can understand why Nokia isn't going to do the work (checking licensing, looking for commercially sensitive information in the source) unless all three criteria are met.
A while back after discussing this with DocScrutenizer, I filed this feature request, but never heard anything back about it, maybe we can use this as a first attempt?

http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9700

According to what Quim told me during the conference, we probably need to first mail -dev and ask for feedback on this, and when there's no response, email the product manager (think "escalation policy") but maybe through the council this could be better handled ?
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to sivang For This Useful Post: