Thread: Apple vs Nokia
View Single Post
Posts: 255 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ United Kingdom
#90
Originally Posted by benny1967 View Post
i think the concept is great as it is. the actual implementation got worse from model to model, but theres still hope. tablets will not be mass market products for some time to come, so we neednt try to find ideas how to make people want tablets as much as they want mp3 players. it wouldnt work: in the end, we'd have a phone or media player, but no tablet anymore. what would this be good for? theres no lack of phones or media players on the market, is there?
But is the Internet still the same Internet as it was back in 2004, when the 770 was being designed? I don't think so. Back then a browser without extensive Java/AJAX/Flash was feasible, because they weren't essentials. Nowadays they ARE essentials because of YouTube, MySpace, FaceBook, Google Docs etc. And that's just right now. There's such a thing as future-proofing. Who knows what will happen in the future? Silverlight? Integrated web apps? Will the Nokia platform be able to deliver when they go mainstream in 1-2 years time? Maybe, but it'll be slow and painful.

The N810 does nothing to address any of this. It merely includes a keyboard, because Walt f***ing Mossberg moaned about the lack of one, and it includes GPS, because somebody has decided all Nokia devices should include GPS.

What should have occurred was a brave decision to perhaps use a new hardware infrastructure that's faster. Apple would have taken this decision at the drop of a hat. I see PDAs that have processors twice the speed of the N800, and better battery life. Don't tell me it can't be done.

Note that a hardware improvement is only one example of how the brief might be out of date.

Nokia is merely improving the device, rather than looking hard at the device itself.