Thread: overclocking (or not) census
View Single Post
geneven is offline geneven
2010-12-16 , 21:41
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#34
Originally Posted by MaddogG View Post
/*OFF OPIC*/



I think you are talking about me (http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1660), but tell me if I'm wrong, I will immediatly apologize and delete this post

Outrageous? Absurd?
First of all, I was only speculating, I was not "quite sure": I didn't say "I know that everyone overclock", and I didn't say "I am sure that the majority of us is overclocking", I only expressed my thought (I said "I think") and tried to explain it. Instead, you are sure that I was wrong, and that my error was otrageus: on which bases do you think I could have been outrageus? Maybe what I think is absurd as you said (I don't think so, maybe it's simply not true: this poll will show us), but not otrageus. Why are you so angry?

Btw, I didn't say 1.1GHz, but 1GHz: 100MHz of difference are important when talking about a 600MHz processor

/*OFF TOPIC END*/
Yes, it was you. It makes me mad because it is so far from reality. It's like guessing the typical American driver goes 90 mph daily. If you are going to guess at something, at least have glanced at the evidence.

It is clear to anyone who has spent a while reading the Overclocking thread that users overclocking at more than 1 gHz are relatively rare. Most of those who do are happy, but that is not the issue.

A poll is the best way to counter your off-the-planet assertion.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.