View Single Post
Posts: 303 | Thanked: 146 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#55
Originally Posted by railroadmaster View Post
The importance of Windows on is that you won't be stuck with Intel (overpriced), Amd (lacking in marketing and technological areas), and Via (pretty much limited to low power chips). You also won't be stuck with an Architecture that drains power faster than an ant eater in an Ant hill. We also aren't stuck with an Architecture that has been around since 1975. Arm also brings you chips from almost every company in the world so Qualcomm, Texas Instraments, Nvidia, Apple, Samsung, Telechips, Marvell, IBM, Freescale, etc vs only having Intel, Amd, and Via. In my opinion the future of Chip and architecture design is one like the GNU approach where the Architecture and Processor designs are available free to everyone and the community helps contribute to design and develop of the Architecture and then companies can tweak them a little bit (like companies do now), but put more time and money into manufacturing and marketing chips and spend less time on developing them.
While what you say is true, you must keep in mind that being 35 years old is not a bad thing. The architecture is very mature, and companies like Intel and ARM have over 50 years of combined experience in X86 design. Newer cheaps are more powerful and efficient every year. ARM is very immature compared to X86.
There is another thing here: An X86 can do in one instruction what an ARM must do in 4-5 instructions. This is why at the same frequency an X86 will always be considerably more powerful.

And there is the backwards compatibility too, a lot of software is no longer maintained, so it can't be recompiled for ARM.