View Single Post
Posts: 2,006 | Thanked: 3,351 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
#12
Originally Posted by James_Littler View Post
There is of course another advantage of capacitive over resistive.

Durability!

The screens are able to be made of glass, they are stronger, less prone to scratches, don't get 'clicky' after a few months of use, still work if the screen is shattered, can withstand heat (say an ember from a cigarette floats down onto your phone screen).
If the glass is so durable and scratch resistant, why wasn't flexible glass invented?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_glass
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/25429/?a=f
It could be used for resistive screen


Originally Posted by ndi View Post
Because you'd be fingering the motherboard if the screen would be flexible.

We have the technology to make immortal screens, it's just that none of us can afford it. Diamond surfaces are achievable and are virtually immune to scratching assuming you have a cash fountain you no longer need.

Or, assuming you can live with a less-than-one-inch screen. Watches have very-very-tough screens since forever.

Tissot used to sell a sapphire screen with touch for a watch, IIRC. <Google>. Here we go. "By simply pushing the crown and then touching the tactile crystal at different positions these functions can be activated. Touch the screen at two o'clock and your current altitude appears on the digital readout. Touch the crystal at six o'clock and the hands move around into position to become a compass". About a thousand USD, before you ask. ~30 mm diameter, before you ask.


First, resistive screen is already based on two flexible sheets, and we don't finger the motherboard.
The problem was that flexible and glass are incompatible, and the glass is the most scratch-resistant material for a screen (or described so) and is used in capacitive screens, so I asked why there is no flexible glass.

Second, it's true that manufacturers cannot afford to produce immortal devices and most consumers don't want their devices to be immortal (because they would have to find a way to upgrade their processors, RAM, camera, and other modules in order not to be left behind), and thus immortal devices become very rare and expensive.

Third, the watch you described is a ludicrous luxury. Not customisable? Not repairable? I already have mechanical watch and normal non-digital compass; if I find mechanical barometer, I will be able to see altitude, too. Without capricious electronics.
Though I would like to have all these mechanical watch, magnetic compass and barometer miniaturised and put inside a finger rind, where I can look at them through a Stanhope lens
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanhop...tical_bijou%29
It would be convenient, require no electrical power, compact, and well-protected against viruses/electromagnetic waves. At maximum, the compass could be confused by magnetic fields. And it would probably last longer, than tactile screen. The main problem would be miniaturisation of mechanical watch, I think.

Last edited by Wikiwide; 2011-01-14 at 02:57.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: