View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#26
Originally Posted by philheaton View Post
knew that...although the kernel is Mach not BSD so, no its not a BSD distro.

...and that. My point was Mac OS X is not UNIX based; it IS UNIX.
You don't really read, do you? MacOS isn't UNIX. It isn't UNIX any more than BSD is UNIX. BSD is not UNIX either. It's UNIX derived. BSD forked off of UNIX a long time ago, so they're not one and the same. UNIX still exists separately from BSD. Every carefully worded and accurate article makes sure to point out that MacOS X is UNIX-based... not UNIX. (refer to the articles I cited above and also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X)

I will concede on one point of miswording on my part, though. MacOS is actually running the XNU kernel. Period. The SNU kernel is MAINLY based on BSD and based in PART on portions of Mach--so we're both right, actually. It's a BSD and Mach kernel mishmash.. so it isn't really a distro for BSD so much as a distro (collection of kernel with commands and applications for a complete and usable operating system) for XNU.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: