that "news" source is a forum, and their source is a thread on our forum. THAT I MADE. lol. um, thanks? no, it's just perpetuating more guesses as facts. if you go read my thread, my conclusion is WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE N9.

If you can't find my thread, or are lazy, let me summarize:
nCDK is a bunch of parts stapled together onto a circuit board, and just because it's labeled medfield doesn't mean anything. They could have swapped half the parts out, the 1.6ghz might just be some other random cpu. It doesn't say penwell. We don't know what Intel will deliever as final silicon, and while it's fun to look at the parts they built the reference device out of, and make guesses about the N9, we have no proof of anything.
Those specs they put are really bad, why do they list gigabit lan and hdmi?