View Single Post
Posts: 1,425 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Hong Kong
#111
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@9000: If you felt you were 'lead' somewhere, it may be because I've presented some facts and history in my post that supported what I was implying.
Unless you're a major religious leader, of course you must bring up some facts to support your opinions. However, wether the facts could be enough to support your believes is questionable, which I've already answered, with bonus!

Originally Posted by ysss View Post
Nokia's declining marketshare represented public interest to Nokia's product (and brand), among the many options in the market.

Yep, that was the point of these texts.
Again, I'm rather uninterested in the direction you're leading, but since you insist on bringing it up, then I assume you think this should be on-topic. Then tell me, how does this 'fact' corelate to the motivation behind people like you sticking around here just for reminding people from time to time how bad N900, maemo and Nokia, comparing to Android Phones and iPhone etc. are?

Or you believe there's any economic influental factors to adversely affect Nokia's marketshare just by saying bad things about Nokia here?

Well....then the reality you preceived is just barely enough to fit your ego