View Single Post
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#2078
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@dan: Actually, I'm not all that happy about this whole Elop's memo thing. If that memo is true (and I'm quite certain it is, though I'm still hoping it isn't) it means to me that Nokia is about to lose a very big chunk of its corporate/brand personality.

Going Android/WP7 as a stopgap measure is understandable, as long as they still work on developing their own Qt delivery system... otherwise, Elop seems to have just made the deal of the century.... for Microsoft.
It doesn't seem like a bad regroup strategy, but whether or not this is long-term remains to be seen. I agree, if this is long-term, then Nokia will be just another handset maker.

If they go WP7, they will still potentially be sacrificing the low/mid-end market, as WP7 is tied to a minimum spec, which is rather high-end -- this is Apple's territory. Android will continue to dominate the mid-range and slowly encroach on the entry low-end devices. Nokia would be fighting Apple, and to a lesser extent, Android for the high end with a platform that is yet to gain serious traction, and all the while leaving their strongest market vulnerable to a beast of a competitor which is known to be advancing.

Trying to capture the masses with the catch-up tactic of 'moar appz' is a losing battle. There's very little reason for developers to even consider Nokia's upcoming platform with Apple and Google gobbling up market share at a break neck pace.

The armchair CEO in me says, go Android, but differentiate with *something*. Maybe device tie-ins, or corporate functionality, but something. Buy time, fall back, and continue developing QT/MeeGo and searching for a good leader.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: