View Single Post
Posts: 1,033 | Thanked: 1,013 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#296
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
Oh, there were so many other 'signs' that the n900 was not a 'finished' product. But it was never 'promoted' as beta or unfinished (as you've claimed they have).

....and that may have invited the wrong crowd to sample the n900 and it may have left a bad taste to too many unintended audience (not to mention some that came to vent and voiced their frustrations in this forum, etc).

Moreover, I had the impression that the 'step 5' that was envisioned a few years before was still not competitive enough with the competitors' offerings.

It's a moving target, Nokia wasn't fast enough.
Well, obviously they wouldn't go on promoting the N900 with the "in your face" attitude. The beta status was implied and I just gave two obvious signs even though there are more just like you said. If they did say it was a beta phone, I don't think there would be any stores selling them. Anyhow, the N900 did sell quite a lot with no marketing whatsoever. I do see more and more N900s around me by the day.

Step 5, we won't know it's status soon. And by what we have on offer with step 4, I would love to know what 5 is and I can bet it would have been awesome.

Last edited by patlak; 2011-02-12 at 22:53. Reason: grammar