Thread: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
View Single Post
Frappacino is offline Frappacino
2011-02-13 , 23:41
Posts: 619 | Thanked: 691 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#40
Originally Posted by maluka View Post
In the days before the announcement there was also a piece about Nokia's huge R&D spending that suddenly showed up also out of thin air. There are far too many coincidences in the lead up to this event. He decided to go with WP7 long before the day before the announcement as he has said.
Ah - someone here is starting to think with the right mindset.

All articles that appeared in the media like this are part of a information campaign - its no coincidence.

The appointment of a M$ guy as CEO by the board is also no accident and is deliberate.

When asking the question WHY WP7 was picked instead of Meego, TECHNICAL considerations of which is a better product should be TOTALLY ignored - business people at a high level who make these decisions dont know technical **** - they only know buzzwords and talking points.

You would be better off looking at the money trail, who talked with who in public and who loses and who gains in each viable outcome.

Assuming that Meego was dropped for WP7 for technical reasons just shows that you have never worked in a corporation at a high level.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frappacino For This Useful Post: