Thread: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
View Single Post
wmarone is offline wmarone
2011-02-14 , 21:38
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#184
Originally Posted by pxa270 View Post
Huh? Suppose for the moment that the handset UX was nowhere near ready for a launch this year. How can you say it has nothing to do with MeeGo?
Because Nokia's UX was going to be closed source. The reference UX is the bare minimum required to operate a device, not a complete user experience. This was laid out many times.

So whatever Nokia had, has no bearing on MeeGo itself, which is much, much more than the reference user interfaces that people have been crying and whining about.

Originally Posted by alcade
BIG TEXT
Totally fair question, however Intel has not been tried for anti-competitive actions, only investigated in ways that led them to folding (and fast!) The caveat with the MeeGo partnership vs WP7, is that Intel never once had a hold on Nokia over it.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: