View Single Post
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#41
Originally Posted by Creamy Goodness View Post
Yes, for long. "announced" is not "in production".
Well, strictly speaking Intel isn't shipping 32nm medfield yet either. They may have a lead, but I'd be very surprised if it's more than a few months. Meanwhile the ARM side isn't standing still, they're already working on 14nm.

Read the beyond 3d article.
I did, it doesn't seem to share your optimism ("It is conceivable that Atom on 32nm could get very close to the power efficiency of competing 40nm ARM processors").

CISC can *sometimes* do more in a cycle than RISC.
I was referring specifically to the crippled IA32 ISA. Things are a lot better in long mode, or even "x32abi". The Atom implementation in particular (lacking out-of-order) seems to be outperformed by the competition even in x86 space.

But anyway, if they manage to produce something that can idle for a week or more on a ~1.5Ah cell I won't complain ;-)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: