View Single Post
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#1515
Thanks for playing But I'm guessing that your answers were a bit out of context to what funkord had in mind.

You're right that the companies you quoted were small/insignificant in the particular segment (smartphone) when they started, but as a whole they were already giant corporations with immense amount of resources.

Certainly not the 'small' that funlord was talking about.

I think Nokia (at least a good amount of well placed people there) GOT the zen/tao of open. They opened Symbian and they were pursuing maemo (then MeeGo) for quite awhile.

But both of those pursuit ended in financial disappointment.

Nokia had problem executing. Orrrrrr... making money out of FOSS is just too hard for big corps?

Lastly, you're right about the smooth migration; but they wouldn't have gotten a great deal from MS that way.

I really think MS gave them a ridiculously good deal (in financial terms; upfront cash, potential shared revenues, etc) to get them onboard crazy ballmer's train.

Originally Posted by Wiener View Post
Apple? Nokia joked about Apple iPhone a few years ago!
HTC? Samsung? LG? All of them were small in mobiles a few years ago. It's not only innovation, but you must -in particular in consumer electronics- anticipate trends ~ 1-3 years in advance. Nokia was only running behind the marked for years.

The problem is management of Nokia didn't get how much potential is in Maemo for future devices and visionary applications of all kind beyond Smartphones (that is lost for Nokia anyhow). Just think of future car2car networks, driving assistance systems, etc. Maemo has (had?) a good position in automotive applications - an interesting future market.

I agree that Nokia had to increase cashflow, and hence had to use additional platform (WP7, Android, whatever). However, Nokia might have just added these platforms without destroying existing ones (Symbian, Maemo). Just slowly reducing Symbian development and moving towards Maemo or WP7 would have been more safe and more visionary strategy. The value of the Nokia stock just reflects this issue.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!