View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#1683
Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
Of course the users who are fine with it won't bother deleting it. That's the point though - what does the majority lose if the UI is packaged separately? Nothing, other than a tiny inconvenience of clicking install on a second/third package. What does the user who DOESN'T want it have to do? Or do they not matter because they're a minority?
Indeed; and I think my opinion lies closer to yours; however, where does it stop? Personally, I think zaxisrotation is fantastic and - possibly in future - should be as widely used as possible. However, editing transitions.ini isn't a nice way of enabling that for such a beneficial feature. So people install the CSSU & a GUI settings editor - which is too complex (or, ultimately, we change the default. Muwahahaha)

Similarly with rotation lock: the CSSU can provide the capability (through a gconf key) to expose an orientation lock. But then it's not actually useful until someone installs the status area menu (note, this is proper orientation lock, not a forcerotation shortcut only for devs). So, now we're up to 3 packages for the "ideal Maemo" experience.

As you say, though, people might not be interested in rotation lock. For though, existing control panel settings applets are replaced or enriched; so you could have Display > Alternate orientation effect and Display > Show orientation lock.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: