View Single Post
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#1728
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
The (deb-) change should start from the Debian or from Ubuntu. They should see the importance. And yes, it is a problem.
But what about all those other horrible non-RPM distributions? What should they do?

It would solve some of the problems and would be the good start to get more non-fragmented ecosystem for commercial companies making software for Linux.
The "ecosystem" isn't fragmented as it is, unless you're talking about a lazy proprietary developer (the ones that whine loudest about the kernel's dynamic nature, for instance) that insists on everyone conforming to their desires.

About the only way to eliminate this "fragmentation" of which you speak (you may be confusing it for diversity) would be to forcibly shut down every distro outside the one you prefer, since even openSuSE and Fedora differ in ways such that packages don't migrate cleanly.

Yet despite Linux's dynamic nature, some companies, like Xilinx, still deliver their most powerful software in a manner that works on more Linux systems than just RHEL or SuSE Enterprise.

I suppose you are suggesting that this would allow developers to generate their own packages. There's nothing stopping them now, and they'd still have to generate multiple RPM packages, one for each distro in question.

Linux Foundation is right not to give permission to use "Meego"-name for N950 unless it doesn't use rpm-package system. We do not want or need more fragmentation in Linux ecosystem than there already is.
Yes, because the MeeGo standard explicitly states compliance to the LSB and the LSB specifies using RPM. That, however, is only a tiny issue with respect to why Maemo 6 does not qualify for the MeeGo name.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: