View Single Post
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#2321
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
I have to wonder how much of that Xoom performance benchmarking is effected by unaccellerated vs accellerated performance under Honeycomb, though. Didn't Xoom get pushed out kind of early to get it out there ahead of competition... and I thought I remember hearing that this first (3.0.0) version of the OS was expecting to get far better drivers later? I might be misremembering it as some other product, though. Anybody know for sure?
Well, we're talking about the chip throughput, running tests that are likely to be native code on both platforms. I would be shocked if these numbers would be that hugely affected by kernel module optimization. I suppose anything is possible, though I'm not going to hold my breath.

Assuming that the T20 just isn't up to snuff:

The iPad2 will lead this generation of devices in performance (GPU). The two major Android players, Samsung and Motorola were likely considering their bottom line over this crucial part, and it will cost them a year for the all-important gamer demographic. Apple will wipe then floor with them.

I'm actually quite disappointed with Samsung. I was surprised when I learned that the Tegra 2 (last years SoC) was to be in the tablet, but figured that internally, they had considered the SoC options. Of the options are the Scorpion w/ Adreno 220, and Samsung's own Exynos 4210 w/ Mali 400MP. These designs (this year's SoC -- with the possible exception of the 220, for lack of specs) compete on paper with the A5's SGX543.

Samsung seems to have made a really bad decision. In fact, the Galaxy S2 should outperform the Tab10.1 by a healthy margin. Sad.

If it is just a case of software optimization (which I doubt), then I'll eat my hat!

Last edited by Capt'n Corrupt; 2011-03-13 at 11:46.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: