View Single Post
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#2541
Originally Posted by Capt'n Corrupt View Post
I'm not sure if this is such a bad strategy.. It seems that there's a race to have an appliance-like OS, and the web provides a quick and easy entry into this market.

The major challenge for Motorola is connecting their 'web os' (heh) to a functional store, or way of finding web applications for its users.

I anticipate that many, many more manufacturers are going to do the same.

If you take a look at the 'Chrome OS' thread, you'll see some examples that allude the the quality and capability that are possible with web applications. As browsers improve, more than 99% of common apps should be do-able on the web.

Like you, I'm skeptical about this course that Motorola has chosen, but I don't see it being a danger to their Android installation, but offers a tremendous opportunity to claim a stake on the upcoming web-warz.

They could have done without the press release...
Aye, I was just berating them because they seem to have a pattern of spoiling what started out as a 'good' thing.

1. Razr: it was a good & simple workhorse, then they overdevelop the skins without appreciable increase to the core strengths and finally overdose the world til they could take no more Razrs.

2. Android? I guess this one is personal, cause I'm bitter for reading good things about the (original cdma Droid) and when I bought the Milestone (int'l gsm version of droid) I later found out its bootloader is locked up tight. And that they botched up execution of a pretty cool concept in Xoom.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: