View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#2630
Originally Posted by Capt'n Corrupt View Post
That article reads a lot like a conspiracy theory.

Any company worth its salt has contingencies and a diverse and complimentary product/service offering to increase revenue and buffer for the changing times.

Oh, and the 'destruction of wealth' is ridiculous. Wealth is byproduct of productivity, in fact this is the very measure of a nations wealth (GDP). This is why 'free' OSS (eg. linux), open standards (eg. web), or academic information (eg. academic papers), or repositories of information (eg. libraries/wiki) can increase wealth dramatically more than proprietary systems -- it lowers the cost of entry and innovation all the while speeding up technological advancement. In other words: less time, more productivity. It's value cannot be measured directly as its cost is 0.

But thanks for the article. It's a reminder why I can continue to ignore Gizmodo.
You clearly missed how Linux and open-source have COMPLETELY destroyed the server and handset markets! Thank GOD the desktop market was saved from that onerous open-source operating system!

Originally Posted by LTman View Post
Hey if you need a new name for this tread then call it "the epic capt'n'corrupt" htread since pratically all the posts here belong to him
Not true. I can tell you that at least ONE of the posts was from you. I quoted it (above) for you to refer to.

Originally Posted by Capt'n Corrupt View Post
David Pogue is at it again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM0EnOhj3cc

*face palm*
I added this comment to the YouTube comment for the video:
David Pogue with an ORIGINAL way to look like a snarky Apple fanboi. Look at the way he tries to hold off criticism by quickly putting the brakes at the end in the hopes that he doesn't lose ALL appearance of such TOTAL credibility. I kid--I kid. I kid because I like it. I like how seriously and credible your review was and how truly worthy of a slice of my day it was to watch.

You see what I did there, right? Oh the sarcasm! The sarcasm!
Man, I wish I could see what he would say back. But then, he's probably so 20th Century that he doesn't even know how to read the "Youbook or whatever it is" comments. We should forgive him, though, I'm sure he has little time to really properly review things and get more practical experience what with being busy playing video games on his iPad instead of actually having an interest in the technology he "reviews."

Originally Posted by ysss View Post
On the other hand, a great majority of his 'copycat' remarks wouldn't have been uttered if he was reviewing a maemo/meego handset. So imho there is indeed a pretty big similarity between those ui elements on honeycomb and iOS that he's showing.

(but yeah, there were quite a few honeycomb-exclusive features that he just glossed over without even mentioning)
Not to mention that touchscreen computing (and computing in general) has been used for decades--and they've been evolving steps at a time--not so much innovating whole leaps at a time as he seems to want you to think Apple does. Most of what Apple did with the iPad was already being done in some form or another either by someone else or themselves already. The next thing that comes along is ALWAYS a little like the last one. Anyone remember how you had to slide to unlock a Palm phone? Multiple desktops on the Palm OS goes back a LOOONG way. Hell--Apple even did a lot of these touchscreen things back with the Newton. I'd like to know if he came out swinging the same way when EVERY graphical OS in the late 80's and into the 90's had a windowed desktop OS with office metaphors (trashcans, folders, etc., like the MacOS, Windows, GEM, Geos, etc.) when we all know they were copycats too (Xerox PARC). To their credit, every OS pretty much tried to create their own spin on a good idea. This was a GOOD thing.

As little as I know about David Pogue, the few times I'm bothered to read or watch him, he's struck me as a poor journalist with poor technology reviewing skills, very little practical memory of computing history (given the way he reviews) and a snarky jackass. Not someone I'd go out of my way to get a review from when I'm looking for Pros and Cons on devices even from the typical users' perspective. He's, effectively, a technology political satirist at best. Tsk.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR

Last edited by danramos; 2011-03-28 at 08:50.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: