The only differences the devs claim relative to Blessn900 relate to:

"- Faster processing due to utilization of DSP and GPU;
- Option to launch A Better Camera instead of standard camera application when the cover is opened" (Pannich 2011ost 7).

So better than Blessn900 in termsof image? Answer clearly a no!

But then I think that the lowlight output of Blessn900 far outstrips anything else. And the zoom, given that it IS digital in the first place, is pretty good too. Funnily enough, I am not a fan of the Blessn900 HDR, preferring the Nokia HDR. Are we not funny how we differ