Nice, I was wondering what Qualcomm was waiting for. They're undeniably late/slower than the competitors which sort of slowed HTC in the market, I speculate.

But I can't shake this feeling that the OMAP 4430 should perform better than shown. Cause the 4440 is the current beast:
+TI closesly collaborates with ARM and usually polishes up the reference desing (where others just look for areas that they can modify and cut costs).
+TI adds extra functions such as various DSPs and sound modules.
+And the SGX540 is more powerful than the Adreno 220, just barely.
=Going by several guestimates the 4440 should do something close to 40-44fps on that benchmark.

I'm guessing the "appauling" results by the Optimus 3D maybe due to a smaller RAM, underclocking, a biased benchmark (not suprising given Qualcomm's involvement) and most likely dodgey drivers by LG (imminent).

Anybody else notice the iPhone 4's bad results, seems like a biased-benchmark considering the A4 SoC should be on par with the T-mobile G2. However the code is executed by C/C++ or Objective-C which is several layers closer to the cpu/gpu (hardware accelaration) on the A4 than Android's java-implementation. So Apple should have a boost/advantage over the Android competition but the effect seems to be opposite according to those figures.