Thread
:
[poll] n [debate]Your next phone screen Resistive or Capacitive?
View Single Post
ndi
2011-04-17 , 10:44
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#
45
I voted resistive. I hope I can get one, though.
IMO, capacitive is f* great, I have a 23 inch at work and it's cool. But on a 23 inch, a finger is a little smaller that a standard button, and Windows can be coaxed into increasing close, minimize, scrollbars, etc and newer Windows has drag.
BUT. On a phone, my finger covers 128x128 pixels. Precision might be up, but I can't see what I touch, and a nail is useless for insta-pointer. TMO is virtually useless without a pen, e.g.
If I had a phone with 300x200, maybe touch is better. On a hi-res, waste of pixels. There is no point in seeing page numbers if I can't click, or read small text if I have to soom to do anythiing.
So, for me, it's resistive all the way for things that fit in a pocket. Pad? Maybe capacitive. Desktop and info points? Capacitive.
Also, you are doing it wrong. Sweping is easy on my phone. I have NO idea what you are on about. I have never missed a drag operation, and I have all-three-star in Angry birds.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
Quote & Reply
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post:
saned
ndi
View Public Profile
Find all posts by ndi