Active Topics
-
Longtime users: What device(s) are you using today? (52)
to General by Wikiwide - 1 day, 7 hrs ago -
Registering (1)
to General by Halftux - 1 day, 21 hrs ago -
Applications Wishlist (55)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by sixwheeledbeast - 3 days ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (2)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by insanelysexy - 5 days ago -
Using LM2596 DC-DC for N900 (7)
to General by insanelysexy - 6 days, 16 hrs ago - more...
 |
bongo |
2008-09-11
, 12:36
|
|
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ Trier, Germany
|
#11
|
Originally Posted by frethop
Is there a ready-to-use image for qemu?
 |
|
2008-09-11
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 60 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ It's dark in here. I hear laughing.
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by bongo
I don't think so. I only heard of one. I don't remember where I heard it. But it was being built.
Is there a ready-to-use image for qemu?
Having something lighter that ran with qemu, then using TA-t3's "git" methods would be very cool.
EDIT: Check the maemovmware Garage page. On the bottom is the mention of qemu. It's unclear what version is in there or what the status of the build is.
|
|
2008-10-09
, 20:43
|
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#13
|
Apparently qemu can use VMware images now, so it shouldn't be hard to get the Maemo SDK image running under it. I'm using it with VirtualBox and it was quite easy to set up.
|
|
2008-10-10
, 09:25
|
|
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ Trier, Germany
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by closetpacifist
ah, nice hint.
Apparently qemu can use VMware images now, so it shouldn't be hard to get the Maemo SDK image running under it. I'm using it with VirtualBox and it was quite easy to set up.
works, thx
__________________
ongo bongo!
ongo bongo!
 |
|
2008-10-12
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#15
|
True, but if you run a 64 bit OS you probably do want to run your VM with hardware virtualization.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
|
|
2008-10-16
, 09:00
|
|
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ Trier, Germany
|
#16
|
I've a running vmware image in virtualbox now, but X doesn't want to start. I just got the error from X that it hasn't found any screens. What's wrong?
__________________
ongo bongo!
ongo bongo!
|
|
2008-11-02
, 04:35
|
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by bongo
I have the same problem. Did you ever figure out the problem?
I've a running vmware image in virtualbox now, but X doesn't want to start. I just got the error from X that it hasn't found any screens. What's wrong?
There is also a version for VirtualBox (here's the torrent) that I'm trying to download, but there is currently only one seeder and it is extremely slow (2KB/s!). I haven't been able to find another copy to download.
|
|
2008-11-02
, 10:26
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#18
|
It was 'converted' from the Maemo VMware 0.8 image. I'm not sure what 'converted' means. The Maemo VMware 0.7 image works out of the box reasonably well in latest VirtualBox 1.6.x as well as 2.0.x tree.
http://maemovmware.garage.maemo.org
http://maemovmware.garage.maemo.org
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
|
|
2008-11-04
, 22:15
|
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Boston area (NE US)
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by allnameswereout
Assuming I haven't totally misunderstood the conversation: there are a number of different VMWare products (and each, of course, has different versions). You can't necessarily take a VM designed for one product/version and run it on a different one - but you can use the (free) VMWare converter to convert the VM.
It was 'converted' from the Maemo VMware 0.8 image. I'm not sure what 'converted' means.
I had to do this as I had a number of VMs that were for player, but I switched over to server, and had to, well... convert
|
|
2008-11-07
, 20:07
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#20
|
Ah. Well, VirtualBox is a VM product. Not a VMware product. I just say, if we know what has been converted, we can do this ourselves.
FWIW, I just used the VMware image (version 0.6) in VirtualBox. I only had to redefine some variables in the VM configuration. It was pretty straightforward.
Thing is, I run 64 bit Linux, and want hardware virtualization (not para virtualization). Right now I installed the SDK (1.x version) using the .tar.gz (NOT the .deb). This works, provided I disabled vdso32 in GRUB entries.
FWIW, I just used the VMware image (version 0.6) in VirtualBox. I only had to redefine some variables in the VM configuration. It was pretty straightforward.
Thing is, I run 64 bit Linux, and want hardware virtualization (not para virtualization). Right now I installed the SDK (1.x version) using the .tar.gz (NOT the .deb). This works, provided I disabled vdso32 in GRUB entries.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 |
| Tags |
| development, portable, sdk |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:45.