Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,152 | Thanked: 1,490 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Czech Republic
#11
Originally Posted by rs-px View Post
It's unstable, and practically unusable. If Nokia wanted to take the time to make it stable, they could, but they just can't spare the resources.
OK, we heard your opinion (repeatedly), we may disagree with that, let's move on.

For me it works quite well and better than 2006 system in many ways. I don't remeber when my 770 rebooted with 2007 system. I also like new features in the UI and browser and better wi-fi power saving (with custom gconf tuning not available on 2006). The name was chosen on purpose to scare clueless newbies away and to make it clear it is bad idea to pick up phone and call Nokia support if something doesn't work.

I still believe it may be unusable to someone (for whatever reason).
__________________
Newbies click here before posting. Thanks.

If you really need to PM me with troubleshooting question please consider posting it to the forum instead. It is OK to PM me a link to such post then. Thank you.
 
Posts: 63 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#12
The 770 has been just fine for me. I flashed the latest os2007HE, and argue symantics all you want, but I have noticed better performance and more stability with os2007HE than with os2006. Added flash 9 support, and the 770 does almost everything I need it too now.

I was thinking about upgrading to the n800 at one time, but that is a lot of cost for just a little bit of improvement, imo. Now, with the n810 coming out, I think I'll wait to upgrade to that.
 
Posts: 17 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Canada
#13
Hello,

I'm new to posting here, but have been lurking for a while.

I bought a Nokia 770 when they dropped to $150 and was suitably impressed with the idea. My new N800 arrived yesterday and I'm very pleased with it. I actually ordered it the day before the N810 was announced. I had the opportunity to kill the order but opted to go with the N800 instead because if several things:

- It's here now, and has been well tested by everyone.
- It's significantly cheaper now. (I paid $275CDN, down from $370)
- One of the reasons I bought it was for the FM radio
- I have no interest in a GPS

If I travelled a lot, or if I hadn't bought a Bluetooth keyboard for my 770, the N810 might have been more attractive to me. However, for my needs, the N800 is still a better fit.

While I'm extremely pleased with my new N800, I do find the button quality and positions a step back from the 770. Actually, overall, I prefer the 770 design but think that the N800's flip-out stand more than makes up for the other design changes. For me, the perfect design would be button position and look of the 770 with the headphone and power at the side like the N800 and with the N800's flip out stand.

The Nokia 770 was a landmark device and will be long remembered in Linux circles, but the N800 is a worthy successor. The N810 seems more to be a branch out to previously untapped markets. In fact, GPS aside, the only thing it has over the N800 is the keyboard. Having said this, I've seen many a post here asking for both a keyboard and a GPS (though rarely the two from the same person.)

I think Nokia would be wise to keep both the N800 (with better expandability, full SD slots and FM tuner) and the N810 (keyboard, GPS, presumably better camera.) In fact, it's nice to see it as a branch in the line rather than a straight-up replacement model, as the N800 was over the 770.

Ack, enough rambling from me.
 
Posts: 17 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Jul 2007
#14
For me the 770 is the bee’s knees. I am going to keep it until this time next year (providing it doesn’t break) when the n810 drops in price.

Like many people before me I believe that the case is a necessary, I like to think that my screen is protected if its in my pocket, and if I have loose change or a pen or something i want to know my screen is going to be scratch free.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:14.