Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#21
Originally Posted by frethop View Post
But when you see an N810 on popular TV shows -- THAT's the device that people will want.
Yeah, look what Stargate SG-1 did for the Tapwave Zodiak!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#22
Look out, he's on a roll!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#23
Originally Posted by frethop View Post
But this does bring one of the keys to success: marketing.
BUT-- let us not confuse successful marketing campaigns with success OF marketing campaigns.

Apple has created the perception that they are more pervasive than they really are. That's great for the "cool" factor, but not so much for the bottom line. In fact, were it not for a huge infusion of cash (gasp! by MICROSOFT!) years ago, Apple may very well have been a dead joke by now.

Microsoft's advertising can be dull, their products ridiculed, their current CEO compared to a witless primate... yet they still managed to eke out and maintain more OS market share than Apple. Sure Apple has mind share... and that's worth... what again?

We'll see where Android goes.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
amigokin's Avatar
Posts: 230 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#24
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
BUT-- let us not confuse successful marketing campaigns with success OF marketing campaigns.

Apple has created the perception that they are more pervasive than they really are. That's great for the "cool" factor, but not so much for the bottom line. In fact, were it not for a huge infusion of cash (gasp! by MICROSOFT!) years ago, Apple may very well have been a dead joke by now.

Microsoft's advertising can be dull, their products ridiculed, their current CEO compared to a witless primate... yet they still managed to eke out and maintain more OS market share than Apple. Sure Apple has mind share... and that's worth... what again?

We'll see where Android goes.
Apple dominates the MP3 players market. Do you think Microsoft has ANY mind share with the fabulous Zune? Zu-what?
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#25
Originally Posted by amigokin View Post
Apple dominates the MP3 players market.
Really? I'd have expected that they dominate in mindshare, but all the little, no name, also rans collectively make up a larger portion of the market.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#26
What he ^ said

EDIT: besides, let Apple have MP3s. Eventually players will be cheaply incorporated into darn near everything, rendering that narrow market of dedicated players a fool's paradise. Like others in the thread, I was looking at computing platforms and operating systems... especially mobile ones.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2008-02-18 at 20:18.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#27
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Also, I don't believe most customers put fashion over function. Some, but not most. See: Apple's OS market share vs Microsoft's.
If you want to use Apple vs Microsoft, you have to come up with some other statement. Microsoft is pure fashion (business fashion, sheepish herd mentality fashion, etc.), and not one lick of function.

Old Apple was, you're right, pure fashion and not much function. But that ended with OSX. Now its fashion combined with function, which is why they're growing again.

The only thing MS has going for it is legacy inertia. Definitely not function.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#28
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
If you want to use Apple vs Microsoft, you have to come up with some other statement. Microsoft is pure fashion (business fashion, sheepish herd mentality fashion, etc.), and not one lick of function.

Old Apple was, you're right, pure fashion and not much function. But that ended with OSX. Now its fashion combined with function, which is why they're growing again.

The only thing MS has going for it is legacy inertia. Definitely not function.
As a longtime Microsoft developer (Visual Studio, SQL Server, etc), I have to strongly disagree. But perhaps that opinion depends on one's experiences.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:50.