|
2009-08-28
, 13:30
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on May 2008
|
#2
|
|
2009-08-28
, 13:44
|
|
Posts: 245 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Bad Homburg, Deutschland
|
#3
|
|
2009-08-28
, 14:11
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#4
|
...the demo video shows the screen bigger (compared to the finger/hand) than it actually is...
The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-08-28
, 15:36
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#5
|
I'd say it's a shame no to put this UI onto a classic tablet sized device (6-10").
The Following User Says Thank You to johnkzin For This Useful Post: | ||
3 screenshots later...
Using a very unscientific method (zoom images until the hand looks as big as your own ), the two sizes seen would could come out as 6.5" (first and second image) and 12" (third image).
At the 6.5" size the UI actually looked *better* (for me) that it did on the live presentation of features (you can see Quim's and Jussi's poking is smooth, but not perfectly effortless, although that might be just the excitement ).
The 12" is a little over the top, but only when the buttons come in. The fun thing is that the look far bulkier on the monitor in the Xephyr emu than on an actual device (the small details on a desktop make the emu buttons look bigger than they are when standing alone - on a 10" netbook it still feels OK
So, if Nokia asks me (which they certainly don't ), I'd say it's a shame no to put this UI onto a classic tablet sized device (6-10").