|
2009-11-25
, 19:22
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#172
|
|
2009-11-25
, 19:29
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#173
|
code177, read the "at this moment" in your quote. At this moment Ovi for Maemo is not public, nobody can publish (as in make public) any software for the N900 simply because there are no Ovi pages for the N900. Simple as that.
|
2009-11-26
, 07:41
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#174
|
|
2009-11-26
, 11:20
|
Posts: 247 |
Thanked: 91 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ London/M4 Corridor
|
#175
|
|
2009-12-04
, 01:10
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ NE UK
|
#176
|
Want to write a casual game for the iPhone and sell it for 99 pence? Good luck with that — first you'll have to cough up £50,000 to get it certified as child-friendly by the BBFC
The Following User Says Thank You to kwotski For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
one billion dollars! |
|
One day Ovi for Maemo will be public, the terms and condition will be public and you will see that being a Premium publisher is not a requirement in order to publish apps for Maemo in Ovi.
None of this has anything to do with open source. The previous step (having a Tax ID or VAT) still applies. The Premium brings the hurdle of the liability insurance, which is what I'm saying that won't be required to publish apps for Maemo.
Just wait till the announcement of Ovi for Maemo. Keep sending your questions to the wiki page. as you see we are doing some homework in order to answer them.
http://maemo.org/profile/view/qgil/ + http://qt-project.org