Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 111 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1
I know higher compression leads to more cpu cycles and smaller files. Yet will the N900 stuggle with highly compressed flac?
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2
I don't believe FLAC will impose a significant amount of CPU usage on the N900. I would consider the amount of space you'll use, however, and if you'll be listening in situations and locations that make using FLAC worth it.
 
ZootHornRollo's Avatar
Posts: 156 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Scotland
#3
i think the file sizes produced by FLAC are too big for portable use. Perhaps look into .ogg - it's a little better than mp3 with regard to the listening quality of the compressed audio and the file sizes are very comparable.

unless you intend on only storing a small amount of music i'd go for .ogg.
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#4
Originally Posted by ZootHornRollo View Post
i think the file sizes produced by FLAC are too big for portable use.
Maybe once upon a time, but these days the N900's ~27GiB can hold (at worst, 30% achieved compression) around 90 hours of CD-quality FLAC-compressed music.
 
ZootHornRollo's Avatar
Posts: 156 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Scotland
#5
assuming you want to fill the entire usable space on the HD
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27.