Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 33 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Roma, Italia
#1
im a lil bit confused guys.... a few days ago i was so convinced to buy n900 with maemo!! ... but then i saw the n8.. i was even happpier.. but i realised u guys dont like symbian... why is that??
i know maemo is better.. but whats the problem with symbian?
because i want to know before i buy anything!
THANKS...
 
Posts: 1,042 | Thanked: 430 times | Joined on May 2010
#2
it's like symbian- kitchen knife and maemo- swiss army knife
 
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 244 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#3
Originally Posted by emiliofab1 View Post
i know maemo is better..
but whats the problem with symbian?
Maemo is "better".

"Better" has different values for different people. There are many threads on this site detailing the limitations of the maemo implementation on n900. If you are happy to live with these limitations in return for a full linux stack with all its openness, then maemo is "better".

If not, then it isn't.
 
Changegames's Avatar
Posts: 277 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#4
for me i like the how i can customize my desktop with maemo no symbian phone can offer that, on symbian^3 you get those preset boxes where you put your widgets bookmarks etc etc dont like it if you ask me... on my n900 i can just place them anywhere i want to match my mood or to match my favorite themes...

Last edited by Changegames; 2010-09-24 at 00:02.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Changegames For This Useful Post:
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 192 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Atlanta
#5
I like Symbian. I have a N82 which runs Symbian v3.1, a 5320 Nuron that runs Symbian v5.

The main difference between Symbian and Maemo is easy: Maemo is a computer OS (Linux) and Symbian is a smartphone OS.

Symbian by far has more phone features and is has more stability with those features than any other SMARTPHONE OS.

Maemo, being Linux, is fully open ended to the user and has more linux pc-like customization options than you can shake a manual at!

The only thing that the media has been able to dog Symbian about is its semi-outdated (thats an opinion) UI. I personally don't have a problem with the non touch Symbian but the current v5 (as in pre-N8 Symbian^3) needs two clicks to select almost everything with makes for a slower and less intuitive user experience.

If you are looking for a computer like Maemo experience, Symbian in any form, just like iOS, Android, Windows Mobile and WebOS is NOT for you. All of those I mentioned are phone OSes with their own strengths and weaknesses.

BUT If you are looking for a powerful phone with a stable and mature code base and 3rd party software support, get the N8.

If you are looking for the successor to the N900 with pc like power, wait for the N9 with Meego.

One thing about Symbian, most bugs have been ironed out by years of development. Crazy Hamster runs without issue on my 5230 but I can't even turn up the volume on my N900 without causing Crazy Hamster Maemo to stutter. Since Symbian is a phone OS, you won't have much of a hacker/development community as there isn't any xterm and typically no dual-booting or any of the uniqueness of Maemo and open source development.

Your needs....your choice. If you can, I would say to add the N8 to your arsenal right alongside the N900.....the best of both worlds.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Deaconclgi For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#6
As said before - the N8 is far more of a phone than the N900 will ever be, and the N900 is more of a computer than the N8 will ever be. That said, Symbian^3 *is* significantly better than ole S60, and the N8 cam *is* in a league of it's own. If you have the option, I would recommend checking both hands-on.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58.